Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Elliott (footballer)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 14:35, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Chris Elliott (footballer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD; player fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. GiantSnowman 14:10, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 14:12, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, has made no senior appearances for Bradford City, on loan to Harrogate Railway Athletic which does not play fully professional league as per Wikipedia:ATHLETE#Association football. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:37, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- Jezhotwells (talk) 14:38, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- Jezhotwells (talk) 14:38, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails all relevant criteria. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 02:40, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:GNG, and without fully pro appearances, fails WP:ATHLETE as well. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:14, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not only does he fail notability guidelines, but has no citations and very little information. Mr.Kennedy1 talk guestbook 14:56, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.