Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gatari Air Service
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) →Bmusician 02:49, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Gatari Air Service (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. No assertion of notability. No external refs only its own web-site Velella Velella Talk 16:01, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral Its not notable and probably doesn't merit a wikipedia article but its still in business for 29 years apparently. And there are 4 images of its aircraft. I probably still lean toward delete. --Artene50 (talk) 19:16, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. The Bushranger One ping only 22:27, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep: Appears to have been involved in a scandal involving the Indonesian President? Possible references: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5] - the last one especially looks promising. - The Bushranger One ping only 22:31, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. The Bushranger One ping only 22:32, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 01:43, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 01:43, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 18:30, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per the references provided by The Bushranger. Tempo reference is pretty good (bit of background information on the company, including verification that it was established in 1983). Books look okay too. Can't access Gatra, although that is a reputable magazine (not in the same class as Tempo, but not far behind) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:36, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I've effected a fairly large expansion, this should pass WP:HEY now. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:16, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep now per the extra references provided. --Artene50 (talk) 18:06, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, good work on the refs provided by The Bushranger. - Mailer Diablo 01:54, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.