Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orders of Magnitude (album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:49, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Orders of Magnitude (album)

Orders of Magnitude (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article makes no assertion of notability: I don't think it passes NALBUM or the GNG. Slashme (talk) 08:53, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:21, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

• Delete and then Redirect as the best solution since it's not independently convincing as an article. SwisterTwister talk 21:31, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:28, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

• Redirect with history - Article has one primary source, and should be redirected with history as a valid search term to Information Society (band). --Jax 0677 (talk) 10:54, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.